Rabbi's Name | Rabbi Yonatan Cohen |
Orthodox Religious Traditional Values | Modern Orthodox |
Affiliation | Orthodox Union |
Nusach | Ashkenez |
office@beth-israel.berkley.ca.us | |
Shacharit Sunday | Sunday and legal holidays: 8:00am |
Shacharit Mon | 6:30am |
Shacharit Tues, Wed, Fri | 6:30am |
Shacharit Rosh Chodesh | 6:30am |
Mincha Weekdays | Five minutes after candlelighting |
Maariv Weekdays | Following Mincha |
Mincha Friday | Five minutes after candlelighting |
Shacharit Shabbat | 9:15am |
Congregation Beth Israel is a Modern Orthodox Synagogue located in Berkeley, California. We are a dynamic community, welcoming to members and guests of all ages, backgrounds and levels of observance. Our facilities are fully wheelchair accessible, including the Bimah.
Our services, classes and community events reflect a love of Torah, Ahavat Israel and a commitment to Tikkun Olam. We are proud of our Shabbat youth programs, our Gan Shalom pre-school, and our stimulating Torah classes.
History
(Credit: http://www.cbiberkeley.org/about/history)
Continuing the Beth Israel Legacy
By Sam Haber
There is an aura of the miraculous that sometimes surrounds the establishment of a synagogue – something like the wonderment at the birth of a baby. One can know the whys and wherefores that led up to it, yet the event itself is still astonishing. Looking over the documents of the dedication of the Berkeley Hebrew Center in 1924 it is easy to see that sense of wonder shared by the founders. As far back as 1915, a small group of Berkeley Jews had been gathering for Friday night and Holiday service in rented space above stores in the Downtown area. However, attendance fluctuated sharply and most of those who came were not drawn from the well-to-do section of society. Nonetheless, this group of Jews was determined to create a permanent house of worship. By July 20, 1924 the work was completed and the cornerstone laid at Bancroft and Jefferson Street in Berkeley.
What sort of Jews were these founders? Perhaps they could most accurately be described as the “Jewish” Jews of Berkeley. They openly asserted their Jewish identity, and were willing to give their energies to enriching Jewish life. This brought with it significant costs. There was an upsurge of anti-Semitism in the ’20s. In the same year that the synagogue was built, Congress passed a law restricting immigration, and particularly from those lands from which most Jews were coming to this country. The Ivy League schools established Jewish quotas for admission, as did most medical schools. Henry Ford, one of the most admired and powerful of Americans, opened an anti-Jewish campaign, printing and distributing widely the scurrilous anti-Semitic forgery, “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” through his privately owned newspaper. Outspoken Anti-Jewish sentiments increasingly could be found in lower class circles and became a whispering campaign among the genteel. Openly affirming one’s Jewishness in 1924 required some spunk and a bit of stubbornness.
For the most part, the founders were immigrants to this country, nostalgic for the life they had left. Although they had not been part of the leadership of the traditional Jewish community in Europe, they still brought with them a love of its customs. Perhaps it is surprising to find that they were helped in their attempts to establish traditional Judaism in Berkeley by two leading Reform rabbis, Martin Meyer and Louis I. Newman. Both were eminent leaders in San Francisco’s Temple Emanuel and both were dismayed to find so many of their congregants slipping away from Jewish identification. They took delight in finding Jews in the Bay Area who were moving in the opposite direction. As early as 1915, Rabbi Meyer served as trustee of the East Bay’s fledgling traditional congregation, and his favorite disciple, Newman, then a graduate student in Semitics at UC Berkeley, served as the congregation’s student rabbi. At first, the Friday night service resembled Reform practice: prayers and then a lecture, followed by concluding prayers. However, the High Holiday services were clearly closer to Orthodox practice. After Meyer died, Newman took over some of his guiding role, until he left in 1929 for a congregation in New York.
Even when these Reform rabbis served as trustees and occasionally officiated at services, the congregation itself pulled in the direction of customary observance. “There will be no traif in the kitchen,” they announced. Heads were covered during services and traditional prayer books were used. Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur ritual was close to Orthodox practice. A Hebrew school was set up to educate the Jewish children of the community, and it had a somewhat sporadic history. Admittedly, the most popular social activity of the Berkeley Hebrew Center was the Saturday night card game, but even here a significant portion of the “pot” would go to pay off the mortgage of the shul and for worthy Jewish charities. They were proud of their outreach to the University students in Berkeley. The congregation arranged banquets and dances at which Jewish student could meet and become acquainted. The shul became an occasional meeting place for the campus Menorah Society. Yet, amidst these many varied achievements, the Berkeley Hebrew Center was beset with a significant failure.
For the most part, the members could not attract their own children to the life of the synagogue. It was the Berkeley Hebrew Center’s efforts to promote Jewish life on the University campus that helped transform the synagogue itself. In the ’50s and ’60s, the University of California had grown from a pleasant and respectable state university to one of the most prominent centers of academic learning in the country. This brought to Berkeley some eminent Jewish faculty and a large group of first-class Jewish graduate students. Some of these faculty members had become disillusioned with the various forms of secular Judaism to which they had given their allegiance, and were looking for a more authentic religious experience. Many of the graduate students had come from observant Orthodox homes and brought to the Congregation a level of learning and practice that greatly enriched congregational life. These students and faculty embodied the spirit of Modern Orthodoxy, the endeavor to combine serious Jewish learning with secular studies. The one shortcoming of this influx was the transience of an important part of the synagogue membership that it brought with it. The comings and goings of graduate students and, to a lesser extent faculty, gave a degree of an instability to long-term congregational life that Beth Israel continually had to counter